Reply to Arne Heise's ‘The incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas'

Rod Thomas*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    I thank Arne Heise for his commentary on my debate with Mark Pernecky and Paul Wojick (Pernecky and Wojick, 2019, 2020; Thomas, 2020). Here, I offer a reply to some of its content.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)20-27
    Number of pages8
    JournalEconomic Thought
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2022

    Keywords

    • Kuhn
    • Keynes
    • Popper
    • Paradigm
    • Incommensurability
    • Critical rationalism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Arne Heise's ‘The incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this