Rethinking expert opinion evidence

Kristy Martire, Gary Edmond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article approaches expert opinion evidence from a scientific, specifically cognitive science, perspective. Decades of scientific research on expertise presents a picture of expertise that bears limited resemblance to the categories and practices used by legal institutions to regulate the admission, presentation and evaluation of expert evidence (ie, opinions based on specialised knowledge). This article seeks to explain why legal institutions should direct more attention to scientifically-based criteria and insights, rather than the somewhat crude set of legal proxies developed by common law judges, if they hope to credibly regulate forensic science and medicine evidence in ways that enhance factual rectitude and fairness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-998
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume40
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking expert opinion evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this