Revisiting economic distance and its role in foreign subsidiary survival

Pratik Arte*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this study, we argue the coexistence of arbitrage and costs associated with economic distance engender a non-linear relationship between foreign subsidiary survival and economic distance. Specifically, we suggest that low to medium economically distant countries offer scope of economic arbitrage, whereas the cost of operating in medium to high economically distant countries is substantially high. Thus, subsidiary survival is high in low to medium economically distant countries and low in medium to high ones. We construct an index of economic distance using arguments from the eclectic paradigm of international production and organisational learning theory, and base our measurement on the Mahalanobis method of distance calculation. Empirical analysis is conducted by applying the Cox’s proportional hazard model to a sample of 1771 Finnish foreign direct investments. Our study contributes to the eclectic paradigm of international production by showing that economic distance is a key locational advantage with attached costs and benefits. The key determinant of subsidiary survival in economically distant countries is the net arbitrage over cost disadvantage.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of International Management
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Feb 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting economic distance and its role in foreign subsidiary survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this