Abstract
By supporting creation of protected areas, conservation projects are known to bring economic prosperity to the local communities, but also incite criticism. A common theme in the critique of conservation organizations is the proximity to neoliberal agencies seeking to capitalize on environment, which disadvantage the local communities. Community participation has been proposed as a panacea for neoliberal conservation. However, conservation efficacy is not always contingent on the community involvement and reliance on ‘traditional’ practices in protected areas has not always benefitted biodiversity. Simultaneously, critique of conservation ignores evidence of indigenous activism as well as alternative forms of environmentalism which provide a broader ethical support base for conservation. This article highlights the challenges and contradictions, as well as offers hopeful directions in order to more effectively ground compassionate conservation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 315-324 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Environmental Sociology |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 22 Jun 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- biodiversity conservation
- deep ecology
- ecological justice
- environmental justice
- environmentalism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the Lorax complex: deep ecology and biophilia in cross-cultural perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver