Risk reporting: A review of the literature and implications for future research

Tamer Elshandidy, Philip Shrives, Matt Bamber, Santhosh Abraham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

100 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)


This paper provides a wide-ranging and up-to-date (1997-2016) review of the archival empirical risk-reporting literature. The reviewed papers are classified into two principal themes: the incentives for and/or informativeness of risk reporting. Our review demonstrates areas of significant divergence in the literature specifically: mandatory versus voluntary risk reporting, manual versus automated content analysis, within-country versus cross-country variations in risk reporting, and risk reporting in financial versus non-financial firms. Our paper identifies a number of issues which require further research. In particular we draw attention to two: first, a lack of clarity and consistency around the conceptualization of risk; and second, the potential costs and benefits of standard-setters’ involvement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-82
JournalJournal of Accounting Literature
Early online date31 Jan 2018
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Risk reporting: A review of the literature and implications for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this