TY - GEN
T1 - Sensitivity analysis and optimization of machining parameters based on surface roughness prediction for AA6061
AU - Yahya, Elssa Wi
AU - Ding, Guo Fu
AU - Qin, Sheng Feng
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Surface roughness is strongly affected by machining parameters. In the past few decades, many researchers have established the relationship between the surface roughness and machining parameters, but less attention has been paid to tool shape and geometry. In addition, the number of tool flutes was ignored, which affects in vibrations and machining system. Therefore, this study first-time includes the tool flutes in addition to cutting speed, depth of cut and feed rate as independent variables. Firstly, a set of machining experiments were conducted using AA6061 as a work piece material to provide original data. Response Surface Model (RSM) adopted to establish the relationship model of surface roughness and machining parameters using Minitab 16. Based on analysis of variance (ANOVA), the results show cutter flutes has higher significant followed by feed rate, depth of cut and cutting speed which has less significant. Finally, machining parameters were optimized to desired surface roughness, and optimization prediction error has limited values between -0.02 and 0.02μm.
AB - Surface roughness is strongly affected by machining parameters. In the past few decades, many researchers have established the relationship between the surface roughness and machining parameters, but less attention has been paid to tool shape and geometry. In addition, the number of tool flutes was ignored, which affects in vibrations and machining system. Therefore, this study first-time includes the tool flutes in addition to cutting speed, depth of cut and feed rate as independent variables. Firstly, a set of machining experiments were conducted using AA6061 as a work piece material to provide original data. Response Surface Model (RSM) adopted to establish the relationship model of surface roughness and machining parameters using Minitab 16. Based on analysis of variance (ANOVA), the results show cutter flutes has higher significant followed by feed rate, depth of cut and cutting speed which has less significant. Finally, machining parameters were optimized to desired surface roughness, and optimization prediction error has limited values between -0.02 and 0.02μm.
KW - Machining parameters
KW - Optimizations
KW - Response surface method
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Surface roughness
U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.598.181
DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.598.181
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84905041471
SN - 9783038351795
T3 - Applied Mechanics and Materials
SP - 181
EP - 188
BT - Advanced Materials, Mechanics and Industrial Engineering
PB - Trans Tech Publications
T2 - 4th International Conference on Mechanics, Simulation and Control, ICMSC 2014
Y2 - 21 June 2014 through 22 June 2014
ER -