SERIOL Reading

Carol Whitney; Piers Cornelissen

doi:10.1080/01690960701579771

SERIOL Reading

Carol Whitney, Piers Cornelissen

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the issue of orthographic processing in visual word recognition. We compare the SERIOL model to parallel models in their ability to explain experimental data at the lexical and sub-lexical levels. We find that the parallel models have difficulty accounting for position-independent letter priming, letter perceptibility patterns, and temporal effects.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	143-164
Journal	Language and Cognitive Processes
Volume	23
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579771
Publication status	Published - 2008

Access to Document

10.1080/01690960701579771

Cite this

@article{ecb15148f67c4d52964fa630bf49d6f8,

title = "SERIOL Reading",

abstract = "In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the issue of orthographic processing in visual word recognition. We compare the SERIOL model to parallel models in their ability to explain experimental data at the lexical and sub-lexical levels. We find that the parallel models have difficulty accounting for position-independent letter priming, letter perceptibility patterns, and temporal effects.",

author = "Carol Whitney and Piers Cornelissen",

note = "Special Issue: Cracking the orthographic code",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1080/01690960701579771",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "143--164",

journal = "Language and Cognitive Processes",

issn = "0169-0965",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SERIOL Reading

AU - Whitney, Carol

AU - Cornelissen, Piers

N1 - Special Issue: Cracking the orthographic code

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the issue of orthographic processing in visual word recognition. We compare the SERIOL model to parallel models in their ability to explain experimental data at the lexical and sub-lexical levels. We find that the parallel models have difficulty accounting for position-independent letter priming, letter perceptibility patterns, and temporal effects.

AB - In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the issue of orthographic processing in visual word recognition. We compare the SERIOL model to parallel models in their ability to explain experimental data at the lexical and sub-lexical levels. We find that the parallel models have difficulty accounting for position-independent letter priming, letter perceptibility patterns, and temporal effects.

U2 - 10.1080/01690960701579771

DO - 10.1080/01690960701579771

M3 - Article

SN - 0169-0965

SN - 1464-0732

SN - 2327-3801

VL - 23

SP - 143

EP - 164

JO - Language and Cognitive Processes

JF - Language and Cognitive Processes

IS - 1

ER -

SERIOL Reading

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this