Shifts to Global Development: is this a reframing of power, agency and progress?

Jessica Hope*, Cordelia Freeman, Kate Maclean, Raksha Pande, Gemma Sou

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This special section on global development has been developed from a conference roundtable event run by the Development Geographies Research Group of the Royal Geographical Society. In this special section, we (some of the committee) introduce the four papers and their critical contributions to emerging debates. These extend early work on how the “global” is being made, focusing on the projects of multilateral development agencies and state institutions to examine how (and whether) the rebranding of “international development” as “global development” constitutes a shift in thinking and practice. Together, the papers draw our attention to the considerable opportunities and implications that this reframing offers, while highlighting that critical attention is required as to how that framing is deployed and by whom. They reveal disparity between global development as a much-needed reframing of power, agency, and progress and global development as produced by mainstream development actors and interventions, necessitating more critical research into how this normative agenda is adopted and enacted in dominant policy and practice.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)154-158
    Number of pages5
    JournalArea
    Volume54
    Issue number2
    Early online date30 Sept 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Keywords

    • financialisation
    • global development
    • research funding
    • sustainable development

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Shifts to Global Development: is this a reframing of power, agency and progress?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this