Simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard

David G. Milledge*, Alexander L. Densmore, Dino Bellugi, Nick J. Rosser, Jack Watt, Gen Li, Katie J. Oven

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)


Landslides constitute a hazard to life and infrastructure and their risk is mitigated primarily by reducing exposure. This requires information on landslide hazard on a scale that can enable informed decisions. Such information is often unavailable to, or not easily interpreted by, those who might need it most (e.g. householders, local governments and non-governmental organisations). To address this shortcoming, we develop simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard that are understandable, communicable and memorable, and that require no prior knowledge, skills or equipment to apply. We examine rules based on two common metrics of landslide hazard, (1) local slope and (2) upslope contributing area as a proxy for hillslope location relative to rivers or ridge crests. In addition, we introduce and test two new metrics: the maximum angle to the skyline and the hazard area, defined as the upslope area with slope > 40° from which landslide debris can reach a location without passing over a slope of < 10°. We then test the skill with which each metric can identify landslide hazard - defined as the probability of being hit by a landslide - using inventories of landslides triggered by six earthquakes that occurred between 1993 and 2015. We find that the maximum skyline angle and hazard area provide the most skilful predictions, and these results form the basis for two simple rules: "minimise your maximum angle to the skyline" and "avoid steep (> 10°) channels with many steep (> 40°) areas that are upslope". Because local slope alone is also a skilful predictor of landslide hazard, we can formulate a third rule as "minimise the angle of the slope under your feet, especially on steep hillsides, but not at the expense of increasing skyline angle or hazard area". In contrast, the upslope contributing area has a weaker and more complex relationship to hazard than the other predictors. Our simple rules complement but do not replace detailed site-specific investigation: they can be used for initial estimations of landslide hazard or to guide decision-making in the absence of any other information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)837-856
Number of pages20
JournalNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this