TY - JOUR
T1 - Sleep duration, sleep variability, and impairments of visual attention
AU - Barclay, Nicola L.
AU - Rowley, Susan
AU - Robson, Anna
AU - Akram, Umair
AU - Myachykov, Andriy
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Attentional networks are sensitive to sleep deprivation. However, variation in attentional performance as a function of normal sleep parameters is understudied. We examined whether attentional performance is influenced by (a) individual differences in sleep duration, (b) sleep duration variability, and/or (c) their interaction. A total of 57 healthy participants (61.4% female, Mage = 32.37 years, SD = 8.68) completed questionnaires, wore wrist actigraphy for 1 week, and subsequently completed the attention network test. Sleep duration and sleep duration variability did not predict orienting score, executive control score, or error rates. Sleep duration variability appeared to moderate the association between sleep duration with overall reaction time (β = –.34, t = –2.13, p =.04) and alerting scores (β =.43, t = 2.94, p =.01), though further inspection of the data suggested that these were spurious findings. Time of testing was a significant predictor of alerting score (β =.35, t = 2.96, p =.01), chronotype of orienting (β =.31, t = 2.28, p =.03), and age of overall reaction time (β =.35, t = 2.70, p =.01). Our results highlight the importance of examining the associations between variations in sleep–wake patterns and attentional networks in samples with greater variation in sleep, as well as the importance of rigorously teasing apart mechanisms of the sleep homeostat from those related to the circadian rhythm in studies examining cognition.
AB - Attentional networks are sensitive to sleep deprivation. However, variation in attentional performance as a function of normal sleep parameters is understudied. We examined whether attentional performance is influenced by (a) individual differences in sleep duration, (b) sleep duration variability, and/or (c) their interaction. A total of 57 healthy participants (61.4% female, Mage = 32.37 years, SD = 8.68) completed questionnaires, wore wrist actigraphy for 1 week, and subsequently completed the attention network test. Sleep duration and sleep duration variability did not predict orienting score, executive control score, or error rates. Sleep duration variability appeared to moderate the association between sleep duration with overall reaction time (β = –.34, t = –2.13, p =.04) and alerting scores (β =.43, t = 2.94, p =.01), though further inspection of the data suggested that these were spurious findings. Time of testing was a significant predictor of alerting score (β =.35, t = 2.96, p =.01), chronotype of orienting (β =.31, t = 2.28, p =.03), and age of overall reaction time (β =.35, t = 2.70, p =.01). Our results highlight the importance of examining the associations between variations in sleep–wake patterns and attentional networks in samples with greater variation in sleep, as well as the importance of rigorously teasing apart mechanisms of the sleep homeostat from those related to the circadian rhythm in studies examining cognition.
KW - Attention
KW - cognition
KW - sleep deprivation
KW - sleep duration
KW - sleep variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084993181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1747021819895771
DO - 10.1177/1747021819895771
M3 - Article
C2 - 31813326
AN - SCOPUS:85084993181
SN - 1747-0218
VL - 73
SP - 868
EP - 880
JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 6
ER -