TY - JOUR
T1 - Social- and self-perception of designers’ professional identity
AU - Kunrath, Kamila
AU - Cash, Philip
AU - Kleinsmann, Maaike
N1 - Funding information: The authors would like to thank the reviewers and editor for their constructive comments, that have helped develop this work. The authors are also grateful to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)/Brazil that has sponsored the first author via Ph.D. scholarship (201719/2014-2).
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Designers’ Professional Identity (DPI) is a social- and self-perceptive construct that describes how designers understand themselves as professionals. DPI guides development throughout a designer’s career by shaping professionalism, role assumptions, responsibilities, values and behaviour. DPI links two sets of elements: Personal Attributes and Design Skills. However, little is known about how designers perceive themselves in comparison to other critical actors affecting DPI: educators and managers. While differing perceptions between educators and managers is acknowledged, there is a critical need for more detailed understanding of these differences in comparison to how designers perceive themselves. This study uses semi-structured interviews with designers, design professors, and design managers to shed light on differences in perception of DPI. Analysis of the data highlights critical differences between the three groups. We described these differences with respect to three thematic perspectives on DPI: Technique, Creativity and Rapport. This provides important contributions to understanding DPI, with implications for education and practice.
AB - Designers’ Professional Identity (DPI) is a social- and self-perceptive construct that describes how designers understand themselves as professionals. DPI guides development throughout a designer’s career by shaping professionalism, role assumptions, responsibilities, values and behaviour. DPI links two sets of elements: Personal Attributes and Design Skills. However, little is known about how designers perceive themselves in comparison to other critical actors affecting DPI: educators and managers. While differing perceptions between educators and managers is acknowledged, there is a critical need for more detailed understanding of these differences in comparison to how designers perceive themselves. This study uses semi-structured interviews with designers, design professors, and design managers to shed light on differences in perception of DPI. Analysis of the data highlights critical differences between the three groups. We described these differences with respect to three thematic perspectives on DPI: Technique, Creativity and Rapport. This provides important contributions to understanding DPI, with implications for education and practice.
KW - design activity
KW - design research
KW - human factors
KW - Professional identity
KW - psychology of design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074370580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09544828.2019.1676883
DO - 10.1080/09544828.2019.1676883
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074370580
SN - 0954-4828
VL - 31
SP - 100
EP - 126
JO - Journal of Engineering Design
JF - Journal of Engineering Design
IS - 2
ER -