Social Impact Bonds and public service reform: back to the future of New Public Management?

Max French*, Jonathan Kimmitt, Rob Wilson, David Jamieson, Toby Lowe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores where the increasing adoption of SIBs and outcomes-based contracting may lead public service systems—toward New Public Governance, or ‘back’ to New Public Management. We present analysis from the first significant longitudinal qualitative study of a major UK SIB focused on improving outcomes in the context of social determinants of health to analyze how the two governance logics manifest and interact across the SIB lifecourse. We find that while both governance logics were present at initiation, over time NPM elements strengthened while NPG elements weakened. Two inalienable elements of the SIB model—investor power and data requirements for contract management—appeared to drive this change. Our findings provide evidence that SIBs promote a retrenchment of NPM, rather than a transition to NPG or a hybridization of the two governance logics. Findings also show how NPM, rather than a transitional stage toward NPG, can prove the more resilient and dominant governance logic within institutional forms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Public Management Journal
Early online date2 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Impact Bonds and public service reform: back to the future of New Public Management?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this