Soil phosphorus quantity-intensity relationships to predict increased soil phosphorus loss to overland and subsurface flow

G. F. Koopmans, R. W. McDowell, W. J. Chardon, O. Oenema, J. Dolfing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soil phosphorus (P) quantity-intensity (q-i) relationships, based on common extraction methods, may potentially be used to estimate the risk of P loss in overland flow and subsurface drainage water. Some workers have used nonlinear q-i relationships to derive thresholds in soil test P (STP; a quantity factor) above which the risk of P loss increases, while others find linear relationships and no threshold. We present here a simple modelling exercise (based on Langmuir adsorption theory) along with data from literature to explain the behaviour of q-i relationships, and to give an explanation for this apparent discrepancy. The data indicate that q-i relationships are dependent upon the soil to solution ratio of the P intensity parameter, adsorption capacity (Qmax) and strength (K) of the soil, and the total range in STP. In turn, this affects the calculation of a threshold in STP. The q-i relationship tends towards linearity under conditions of a narrow total range of STP and/or when using a wide soil to solution ratio for estimating the P intensity parameter. Under such conditions, a threshold is difficult to detect, and uncertain. We conclude that the sensitivity of thresholds to experimental conditions and soils needs to be considered if thresholds are to be successful in environmental management to decrease P loss to surface waters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)679-687
Number of pages9
JournalChemosphere
Volume48
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adsorption
  • Desorption
  • Phosphorus
  • Theory
  • Threshold

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Soil phosphorus quantity-intensity relationships to predict increased soil phosphorus loss to overland and subsurface flow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this