Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index

Johannes Honekopp, Janet Kleber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Journal impact factor (which reflects a particular journal's quality) and H index (which reflects the number and quality of an author's publications) are two measures of research quality. It has been argued that the H index outperforms the impact factor for evaluation purposes. Using articles first-authored or last-authored by board members of Retrovirology, we show here that the reverse is true when the future success of an article is to be predicted. The H index proved unsuitable for this specific task because, surprisingly, an article's odds of becoming a 'hit' appear independent of the pre-eminence of its author. We discuss implications for the peer-review process.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRetrovirology
Volume5
Issue number88
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this