Abstract
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Southend-on-Sea v Armour represents the latest step in the arduous journey of art.8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in the realm of housing law. The following commentary discusses the facts of Southend together with the effects of the Court of Appeal’s approach to art.8 and makes suggestions as to how art.8 might develop in the future.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 98-102 |
Journal | Journal of Housing Law |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2014 |