Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Spirituality, Suicide and Mad Studies: Rethinking the therapeutic exchange in health contexts

Annessa Rebair*, Mary Harrison, Toby Brandon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Dominant biomedical explanations of mental distress limit explanations of human experience, the short cutoff diagnosis becomes the pivotal encounter of exchange and narrative about the human being in society. Experts-by-experience and Mad Studies activists continuously challenge these definitions and restrictions in a bid to readdress the imbalance and flawed impositions. This article offers a discussion regarding a place to begin “meeting” a person and co-creating conversations with those who are impacted by the limitations of the biomedical approach as a framework of explanation of their experiences of mental distress. We intend to disrupt such orthodox biomedical views, replacing them with co-produced democratic meanings of madness. In doing so, we challenge the dominant discourse, which is limited to medical treatments of mental distress and suicidal persons.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-674
Number of pages10
JournalMental Health, Religion and Culture
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • spirituality
  • mental health
  • mad studies
  • therapeutic engagement
  • suicide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spirituality, Suicide and Mad Studies: Rethinking the therapeutic exchange in health contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this