@article{317cdbebe6df4b55b3c4ad5e4cb60fad,
title = "Spirituality, Suicide and Mad Studies: Rethinking the therapeutic exchange in health contexts",
abstract = "Dominant biomedical explanations of mental distress limit explanations of human experience, the short cutoff diagnosis becomes the pivotal encounter of exchange and narrative about the human being in society. Experts-by-experience and Mad Studies activists continuously challenge these definitions and restrictions in a bid to readdress the imbalance and flawed impositions. This article offers a discussion regarding a place to begin “meeting” a person and co-creating conversations with those who are impacted by the limitations of the biomedical approach as a framework of explanation of their experiences of mental distress. We intend to disrupt such orthodox biomedical views, replacing them with co-produced democratic meanings of madness. In doing so, we challenge the dominant discourse, which is limited to medical treatments of mental distress and suicidal persons.",
keywords = "spirituality, mental health, mad studies, therapeutic engagement, suicide",
author = "Annessa Rebair and Mary Harrison and Toby Brandon",
year = "2026",
month = jun,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/13674676.2025.2562936",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "665--674",
journal = "Mental Health, Religion and Culture",
issn = "1367-4676",
publisher = "Taylor \& Francis",
number = "7",
}