State Authority and the Public Sphere: Ideas on the Changing Role of the Museum as a Canadian Social Institution

Susan Ashley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    162 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Museums are important public sites for the authentication and presentation of
    heritage in Western cultures. The authority of museums is derived from their
    long history as repositories of material culture and as agents of identity
    formation, nationalism, and most recently, social inclusion. But in a country
    such as Canada where global economics and popular culture combine with
    an unprecedented influx of immigrants, how society imagines itself and how
    the nation articulates its community and its heritage is changing radically.
    Issues of power, meaning, authenticity and citizenship have threatened the
    museum’s representational authority. How are Canadian museums responding
    to these changes, and is their authority now up for debate? Or is the need to
    assert authority a problem in itself and can museums evolve a new type of
    discourse about heritage? This paper investigates museum authority inherent
    in its simultaneous roles as voice of the state and as a public space for opinion
    and meaning making. It focuses attention on Canadian museums and
    government policies that have influenced their authority, in particular, theoretical
    implications of the current drive for ‘social cohesion’. An exhibit on the
    Underground Railroad and African-Canadian history at the Royal Ontario
    Museum in Toronto is examined to consider how museums as instruments of
    the state can be re-tuned as sites of public identity discourse and social
    inclusion.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)5-17
    Number of pages13
    JournalMuseum and Society
    Volume3
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'State Authority and the Public Sphere: Ideas on the Changing Role of the Museum as a Canadian Social Institution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this