Statistical Comparison of Electron Loss and Enhancement in the Outer Radiation Belt During Storms

S. D. Walton*, C. Forsyth, I. J. Rae, N. P. Meredith, J. K. Sandhu, M.‐T. Walach, K. R. Murphy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The near‐relativistic electron population in the outer Van Allen radiation belt is highly dynamic and strongly coupled to geomagnetic activity such as storms and substorms, which are driven by the interaction of the magnetosphere with the solar wind. The energy, content, and spatial extent of electrons in the outer radiation belt can vary on timescales of hours to days, dictated by the continuously evolving influence of acceleration and loss processes. While net changes in the electron population are directly observable, the relative influence of different processes is far from fully understood. Using a continuous 12 year data set from the Proton Electron Telescope on board the Solar Anomalous Magnetospheric Particle Explorer, we statistically compare the relative variations of trapped electrons to those in the bounce loss cone (BLC). Our results show that there is a proportional increase in flux entering the BLC outside the plasmapause during storm main phase and early recovery phase. Loss enhancement is sustained on the dawnside throughout the recovery phase while loss on the duskside is enhanced around minimum Sym‐H and quickly diminishes. Spatial variations are also examined in relation to geomagnetic activity, making comparisons to possible causal wave modes such as whistler‐mode chorus and plasmaspheric hiss.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2021JA030069
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume127
Issue number5
Early online date21 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical Comparison of Electron Loss and Enhancement in the Outer Radiation Belt During Storms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this