Strategies for annotating portfolios: Mapping designs for new domains

A.L. Culén, J. Børsting, W. Gaver

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper, we extend the concept of annotated portfolios to include designs for new domains. Although annotated portfolios were intentionally left open to interpretation and appropriation, most of the published research that uses this method to articulate intermediate knowledge focuses on annotation strategies that abstract new knowledge about the qualities of interaction and about the design domain. We suggest that annotations can do more than pull towards concerns regarding abstraction and show that several not so very theoretical, but relevant findings can be achieved using other strategies. Two additional strategies are brought forward to illustrate this: a chronological design trajectory that shows the historical account of new domain explorations, and a design ecosystem strategy that aims to show how artefacts can work together. We apply all four strategies mentioned above and discuss how they contribute to revealing features of the design space for people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDIS 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    PublisherACM
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2020

    Keywords

    • interaction design
    • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    Research Group keywords

    • Interaction Research Studio

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies for annotating portfolios: Mapping designs for new domains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this