Supervisor Relationships, Teamwork, Role Ambiguity and Discretionary Power: Nurses in Australia and the United Kingdom

Yvonne Brunetto, Rodney Farr-Wharton, Kate Shacklock, Fiona Robson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reports comparative research comparing the relationship between supervisor-subordinate relationships, teamwork, role ambiguity and discretionary power for nurses working in public and private sector hospitals in Australia and the UK. The findings indicate that the four factors accounted for approximately a quarter of the variance for nurses in the UK and almost a fifth of the variance for nurses working in public sector hospitals. Moreover, the findings identify a significant difference across all variables for nurses working in public sector hospitals compared with private sector with nurses in the private sector having higher satisfaction levels and perceiving lower levels of role ambiguity. There were fewer differences for nurses working in Australian hospitals compared with UK hospitals with nurses in Australia perceiving a better supervisor-subordinate relationship and nurses in the UK perceiving greater satisfaction with teamwork.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)532-543
    JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
    Volume35
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • supervisor-subordinate relationships
    • teamwork
    • role ambiguity
    • discretionary power
    • public-private sector
    • Australia-UK

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Supervisor Relationships, Teamwork, Role Ambiguity and Discretionary Power: Nurses in Australia and the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this