Abstract
As the share of supplementary health insurance (SI) in health care finance is likely to grow, SI may become an increasingly attractive tool for riskselection in basic health insurance (BI). In this paper, we develop a conceptual framework to assess the probability that insurers will use SI for favourable riskselection in BI. We apply our framework to five countries in which risk-selection via SI is feasible: Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. For each country, we review the available evidence of SI being used as selection device. We find that the probability that SI is and will be used for risk-selection substantially varies across countries. Finally, we discuss several strategies for policy makers to reduce the chance that SI will be used for risk-selection in BI
markets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 173-192 |
| Journal | Health Economics, Policy and Law |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 02 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Supplementary health insurance as a tool for risk-selection in mandatory basic health insurance markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver