TY - CHAP
T1 - Suspects, victims and others: producing and sharing forensic genetic knowledge
AU - Williams, Robin
AU - Wienroth, Matthias
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - This chapter examines several related non-medical contexts in which genotyping is carried out and where questions arise over who has the right to commission, deploy and share with whom the results of that genotyping. There are three such contexts on which we focus attention. The first – and dominant one – is the application of genetic technologies to biological material recovered from crime scenes, from the victims of crime, from criminal suspects and from others for ‘elimination purposes’ in the course of criminal inquiries. The second is when genetic analysis is carried out on bodies recovered at ‘mass disasters’ in an effort to identify the dead. The third is the sampling and profiling of individuals involved in paternity and maternity disputes, or in other circumstance where it is deemed necessary to prove close genetic affiliation. We refer to all three of them as ‘forensic’ on the grounds that the primary purpose of each is to support legal process of various kinds, including the deliberations of civil, coronial, local, national and international criminal courts. Each genotyping knowledge context raises slightly different issues because of variations in the identities of the persons from whom samples are taken, the nature of the genetic information produced by preferred technologies, the primary purposes which its production serves and varying expectations of how much of this information should be shared with whom and under what circumstances.
AB - This chapter examines several related non-medical contexts in which genotyping is carried out and where questions arise over who has the right to commission, deploy and share with whom the results of that genotyping. There are three such contexts on which we focus attention. The first – and dominant one – is the application of genetic technologies to biological material recovered from crime scenes, from the victims of crime, from criminal suspects and from others for ‘elimination purposes’ in the course of criminal inquiries. The second is when genetic analysis is carried out on bodies recovered at ‘mass disasters’ in an effort to identify the dead. The third is the sampling and profiling of individuals involved in paternity and maternity disputes, or in other circumstance where it is deemed necessary to prove close genetic affiliation. We refer to all three of them as ‘forensic’ on the grounds that the primary purpose of each is to support legal process of various kinds, including the deliberations of civil, coronial, local, national and international criminal courts. Each genotyping knowledge context raises slightly different issues because of variations in the identities of the persons from whom samples are taken, the nature of the genetic information produced by preferred technologies, the primary purposes which its production serves and varying expectations of how much of this information should be shared with whom and under what circumstances.
KW - identity
KW - forensic knowledge
KW - forensic genetics
KW - mass disaster
KW - DVI
KW - DNA database
UR - http://capitadiscovery.co.uk/northumbria-ac/items/1715121
UR - http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/law/medico-legal-bioethics-and-health-law/right-know-and-right-not-know-genetic-privacy-and-responsibility-2nd-edition
UR - http://capitadiscovery.co.uk/northumbria-ac/items/1715121
UR - http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/law/medico-legal-bioethics-and-health-law/right-know-and-right-not-know-genetic-privacy-and-responsibility-2nd-edition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84954147799
M3 - Chapter
SN - 978-1107429796
T3 - Cambridge Bioethics and Law
SP - 70
EP - 84
BT - The Right to Know and the Right not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility
A2 - Chadwick, Ruth
A2 - Levitt, Mairi
A2 - Shickle, Darren
PB - Cambridge University Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -