Testing the validity of online psychophysical measurement of body image perception

Jiří Gumančík, Piers Cornelissen*, Lise Gulli Brokjøb, Bethany Ridley-Gamble, Kris McCarty, Martin Tovee, Katri Cornelissen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This body image study tests the viability of transferring a complex psychophysical paradigm from a controlled in-person laboratory task to an online environment. 172 female participants made online judgements about their own body size when viewing images of computer-generated female bodies presented in either in front-view or at 45-degrees in a method of adjustment (MOA) paradigm. The results of these judgements were then compared to the results of two laboratory-based studies (with 96 and 40 female participants respectively) to establish three key findings. Firstly, the results show that the accuracy of online and in-lab estimates of body size are comparable, secondly that the same patterns of visual biases in judgements are shown both in-lab and online, and thirdly online data shows the same view-orientation advantage in accuracy in body size judgements as the laboratory studies. Thus, this study suggests that that online sampling potentially represents a rapid and accurate way of collecting reliable complex behavioural and perceptual data from a more diverse range of participants than is normally sampled in laboratory-based studies. It also offers the potential for designing stratified sampling strategies to construct a truly representative sample of a target population.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0302747
Number of pages22
JournalPLoS One
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • BMI
  • body judgements
  • view-dependent accuracy
  • online versus in-person

Cite this