Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The academia we have and the one we want: on the centrality of gender equality

Ana Maria Munar, Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore, Donna Chambers, Avital Biran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This concluding essay challenges the tendency in academia to consider feminist epistemologies and gender equality as peripheral when instead they are central to the flourishing of tourism scholarship. We analyze pervasive misconceptions about gender in higher education and present an alternative way of doing academia based on dissent and critical engagement; commitment to democratic practices that allow for different points of view to be shared and accepted as trustworthy; engagement with value judgement in knowledge production; care and accountability in our ways of knowing and teaching; and the establishment of diverse career patterns and decent contractual conditions to researchers so freedom of thought can take place.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)582-591
Number of pages15
JournalAnatolia
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date1 Sept 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • gender equality
  • feminist epistemologies
  • value judgement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The academia we have and the one we want: on the centrality of gender equality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this