TY - JOUR
T1 - The applied theatre practitioner as dialogic hero
AU - Hepplewhite, Kay
PY - 2015/4/3
Y1 - 2015/4/3
N2 - Mikhail Bakhtin proposed that a ‘hero is not only a discourse about himself and his immediate environment, but also a discourse about the world’. This short article examines the working practice of an applied theatre practitioner, drawing on Bakhtin’s interpretations of the hero and his writings on dialogism. Artist Kate Sweeney’s facilitation of a storytelling workshop with older people is explored in order to place the practitioner as the central protagonist in a narrative of participatory theatre processes. My research, using a process of reflective dialogues, has found that experienced practitioners are themselves open to a process of change through the work, which I have articulated as a mode of ‘responsivity’. The research method of reflective dialogues connects observation of working processes with a subsequent conversation with the practitioner about moments of practice, and the meanings that emerge are therefore infused with practitioners’ discourses on the work. Although this research places the facilitator at the centre of the analysis, I also acknowledge the importance of the experiences of participants as collaborators and their role as coauthors of the work. The analysis presented here draws on the motif of the practitioner as hero not as a fixed model but as a shifting co-produced protagonist shaped dialogically through the work.
AB - Mikhail Bakhtin proposed that a ‘hero is not only a discourse about himself and his immediate environment, but also a discourse about the world’. This short article examines the working practice of an applied theatre practitioner, drawing on Bakhtin’s interpretations of the hero and his writings on dialogism. Artist Kate Sweeney’s facilitation of a storytelling workshop with older people is explored in order to place the practitioner as the central protagonist in a narrative of participatory theatre processes. My research, using a process of reflective dialogues, has found that experienced practitioners are themselves open to a process of change through the work, which I have articulated as a mode of ‘responsivity’. The research method of reflective dialogues connects observation of working processes with a subsequent conversation with the practitioner about moments of practice, and the meanings that emerge are therefore infused with practitioners’ discourses on the work. Although this research places the facilitator at the centre of the analysis, I also acknowledge the importance of the experiences of participants as collaborators and their role as coauthors of the work. The analysis presented here draws on the motif of the practitioner as hero not as a fixed model but as a shifting co-produced protagonist shaped dialogically through the work.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84930397661
U2 - 10.1080/13569783.2015.1021322
DO - 10.1080/13569783.2015.1021322
M3 - Article
SN - 1356-9783
SN - 1470-112X
VL - 20
SP - 182
EP - 185
JO - Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance
JF - Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance
IS - 2
ER -