Abstract
Postcapitalist commons are a growing area of interest in the efforts to generate alternatives to capitalism in the present. Commons are understood as self-organised collectives based around shared resources; yet postcapitalist commons have an additional element, in operating within while projecting an “after” capitalism. This can give rise to tensions since commons striving for postcapitalism also require a certain amount of capital to survive and function within capitalism. FairCoop is a radical postcapitalist commons that adopted the cryptocurrency FairCoin in 2014. FairCoop, through FairCoin, was able to generate some trans-local connections through its use of peer2peer technologies and was thus able to scale-up. Its design, however, was ultimately unsustainable due to insufficiently clear boundaries from capital. After highlighting the lack of commons boundaries around FairCoop, we identify some additional commons-capital boundary design principles which could contribute to the sustainability of future postcapitalist commons experiments that are seeking to scale.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 859-883 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Antipode |
Volume | 53 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 19 Dec 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- postcapitalism
- commons
- commons boundaries
- cryptocurrencies
- Fair-Coop
- FairCoin