The concept of mens rea in international criminal law: the case for a unified approach

Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this book is to find a unified approach to the doctrine of mens rea in the sphere of international criminal law, based on an in-depth comparative analysis of different legal systems and the jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals since Nuremberg. Part I examines the concept of mens rea in common and continental legal systems, as well as its counterpart in Islamic Shari'a law. Part II looks at the jurisprudence of the post-Second World War trials, the work of the International Law Commission and the concept of genocidal intent in light of the travaux préparatoires of the 1948 Genocide Convention. Further chapters are devoted to a discussion of the boundaries of mens rea in the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. The final chapter examines the definition of the mental element as provided for in Article 30 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court in light of the recent decisions delivered by the International Criminal Court. The study also examines the general principles that underlie the various approaches to the mental elements of crimes as well as the subjective element required in perpetration and participation in crimes and the interrelation between mistake of law and mistake of fact with the subjective element.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherHart
Number of pages540
ISBN (Print)9781841137605
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013

Publication series

NameStudies in International and Comparative Criminal
PublisherHart Publishing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The concept of mens rea in international criminal law: the case for a unified approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this