TY - JOUR
T1 - The cost of providing mechanical thrombectomy in the UK NHS
T2 - A micro-costing study
AU - Balami, Joyce S
AU - Coughlan, Diamuid
AU - White, Philip M.
AU - McMeekin, Peter
AU - Flynn, Darren
AU - Roffe, Christine
AU - Natarajan, Indira
AU - Chembala, Jayan
AU - Nayak, Sanjeev
AU - Wiggam, Ivan
AU - Flynn, Peter
AU - Simister, Robert
AU - Sammaraiee, Yazen
AU - Sims, Don
AU - Nader, Kurdow
AU - Dixit, Anand
AU - Craig, Dawn
AU - Lumley, Hannah
AU - Rice, Stephen
AU - Burgess, David
AU - Foddy, Lisa
AU - Hopkins, Emer
AU - Hudson, Beverley
AU - Jones, Rachael
AU - James, Martin A
AU - Buchan, Alastair M
AU - Ford, Gary A.
AU - Gray, Alastair M
N1 - Funding information: Alastair Gray is partly funded by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Phil White has undertaken consultancy work for Stryker, Codman and MicroVention who manufacture stroke thrombectomy devices. Gary Ford has received personal remuneration for educational and advisory work from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer and Stryker; and his institution has received educational grants from Medtronic and Pfizer for stroke related activities. Martin James has received honoraria and support for educational activities from Boehringer Ingelheim and Medtronic. Joyce Balami has received a travel grant from Kellogg College, University of Oxford. Alastair Buchan is partly funded by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and is senior medical science advisor and co-founder of Brainomix, a company that develops electronic ASPECTS (e-ASPECTS). Robert Simister is partly funded by the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. Christine Roffe has received personal remuneration for educational and advisory work from Allergan and Daiichi Sankyo and her institution has received educational grants from Medtronic, Brainomix, Firstkind Medical and Johnson & Johnson for stroke-related activities. She was the national coordinator for the ECASS-4 study and is the national lead for SITS International, both of which are partially funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Introduction The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke is well established, but uncertainty remains around the true cost of delivering this treatment within the NHS. The aim of this study was to establish the cost of providing MT within the hyperacute phase of care and to explore differences in resources used and costs across different neuroscience centres in the UK.Method This was a multicentre retrospective study using micro-costing methods to enable a precise assessment of the costs of MT from an NHS perspective. Data on resources used and their costs were collected from five UK neuroscience centres between 2015 and 2018.Results Data were collected on 310 patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with MT. The mean total cost of providing MT and inpatient care within 24 hours was £10,846 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10,527–11,165) per patient. The main driver of cost was MT procedure costs, accounting for 73% (£7,943; 95% CI 7,649–8,237) of the total 24-hour cost. Costs were higher for patients treated under general anaesthesia (£11,048; standard deviation (SD) 2,654) than for local anaesthesia (£9,978; SD 2,654), mean difference £1,070 (95% CI 381–1,759; p=0.003); admission to an intensive care unit (ICU; £12,212; SD 3,028) against for admission elsewhere (£10,179; SD 2,415), mean difference £2,032 (95% CI 1,345–2,719; p<0001).The mean cost within 72 hours was £12,440 (95% CI 10,628–14,252). The total costs for the duration of inpatient care before discharge from a thrombectomy centre was £14,362 (95% CI 13,603–15,122).Conclusions Major factors contributing to costs of MT for stroke include consumables and staff for intervention, use of general anaesthesia and ICU admissions. These findings can inform the reimbursement, provision and strategic planning of stroke services and aid future economic evaluations.
AB - Introduction The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke is well established, but uncertainty remains around the true cost of delivering this treatment within the NHS. The aim of this study was to establish the cost of providing MT within the hyperacute phase of care and to explore differences in resources used and costs across different neuroscience centres in the UK.Method This was a multicentre retrospective study using micro-costing methods to enable a precise assessment of the costs of MT from an NHS perspective. Data on resources used and their costs were collected from five UK neuroscience centres between 2015 and 2018.Results Data were collected on 310 patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with MT. The mean total cost of providing MT and inpatient care within 24 hours was £10,846 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10,527–11,165) per patient. The main driver of cost was MT procedure costs, accounting for 73% (£7,943; 95% CI 7,649–8,237) of the total 24-hour cost. Costs were higher for patients treated under general anaesthesia (£11,048; standard deviation (SD) 2,654) than for local anaesthesia (£9,978; SD 2,654), mean difference £1,070 (95% CI 381–1,759; p=0.003); admission to an intensive care unit (ICU; £12,212; SD 3,028) against for admission elsewhere (£10,179; SD 2,415), mean difference £2,032 (95% CI 1,345–2,719; p<0001).The mean cost within 72 hours was £12,440 (95% CI 10,628–14,252). The total costs for the duration of inpatient care before discharge from a thrombectomy centre was £14,362 (95% CI 13,603–15,122).Conclusions Major factors contributing to costs of MT for stroke include consumables and staff for intervention, use of general anaesthesia and ICU admissions. These findings can inform the reimbursement, provision and strategic planning of stroke services and aid future economic evaluations.
KW - Acute ischaemic stroke
KW - Costs
KW - Mechanical thrombectomy
KW - Micro-costing
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084872720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0413
DO - 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0413
M3 - Article
C2 - 32414740
VL - 20
SP - e40-e45
JO - Clinical Medicine
JF - Clinical Medicine
SN - 1470-2118
IS - 3
ER -