Abstract
The aims were to; develop a food environment classification tool and to test the acceptability and validity of three secondary sources of food environment data within a defined urban area of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, using a field validation method. A 21 point (with 77 sub-categories) classification tool was developed. The fieldwork recorded 617 establishments selling food and/or food products. The sensitivity analysis of the secondary sources against fieldwork for the Local Authority data was good (83.6%), while Yell.com and the Yellow Pages were low (51.2% and 50.9% respectively). To improve the quality of secondary data, multiple sources should be used in order to achieve a realistic picture of the foodscape.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 666-673 |
Journal | Health & Place |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Food environment
- foodscape
- classification
- secondary data
- obesogenic environments