The Forensic Ethics of Scientific Communication

Tony Ward*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
176 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An important part of the work of forensic scientists is communicating accurate information to lay factfinders under conditions of uncertainty. It is an ethically demanding role as it obliges scientists to disclose information that may call their own authority into question. Similar issues arise in other areas of applied science, for example climate science. This article builds the ethical framework for scientific communication under uncertainty proposed by Keohane, Lane and Oppenheimer and argues that with some modifications their work provides useful guidance for forensic scientists. It also questions whether the current system of Streamlined Forensic Reporting is compatible with that framework.

Original languageEnglish
Article number002201832211439
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalThe Journal of Criminal Law
Volume87
Issue number1
Early online date8 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Forensic science
  • Streamlined Forensic Reporting
  • expert evidence
  • professional ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Forensic Ethics of Scientific Communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this