The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law: an Unnecessary Failure

Paul Arnell; Gemma Davies

doi:10.1177/0022018320902544

The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law: an Unnecessary Failure

Paul Arnell, Gemma Davies

Law Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

176 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The introduction of the forum bar into UK extradition law was unnecessary. It is a failure. It was unnecessary because extant law addressed, or could have addressed, the putative mischief giving rise to it. It is a failure because it admits only limited and optional prosecutorial input into forum bar decisions and, more fundamentally, because it is founded upon two misplaced premises. The forum bar is irredeemable and should be repealed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	142-162
Journal	The Journal of Criminal Law
Volume	84
Issue number	2
Early online date	30 Jan 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018320902544
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2020

Keywords

Extradition
forum
forum bar
concurrent jurisdiction
forum non conveniens

Access to Document

10.1177/0022018320902544

ARNELL 2020 The forum barAccepted author manuscript, 331 KB

Cite this

@article{79058c331fb545d88cf11f31ec33be07,

title = "The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law: an Unnecessary Failure",

abstract = "The introduction of the forum bar into UK extradition law was unnecessary. It is a failure. It was unnecessary because extant law addressed, or could have addressed, the putative mischief giving rise to it. It is a failure because it admits only limited and optional prosecutorial input into forum bar decisions and, more fundamentally, because it is founded upon two misplaced premises. The forum bar is irredeemable and should be repealed. ",

keywords = "Extradition, forum, forum bar, concurrent jurisdiction, forum non conveniens",

author = "Paul Arnell and Gemma Davies",

year = "2020",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0022018320902544",

language = "English",

volume = "84",

pages = "142--162",

journal = "The Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "0022-0183",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law

T2 - an Unnecessary Failure

AU - Arnell, Paul

AU - Davies, Gemma

PY - 2020/4/1

Y1 - 2020/4/1

N2 - The introduction of the forum bar into UK extradition law was unnecessary. It is a failure. It was unnecessary because extant law addressed, or could have addressed, the putative mischief giving rise to it. It is a failure because it admits only limited and optional prosecutorial input into forum bar decisions and, more fundamentally, because it is founded upon two misplaced premises. The forum bar is irredeemable and should be repealed.

AB - The introduction of the forum bar into UK extradition law was unnecessary. It is a failure. It was unnecessary because extant law addressed, or could have addressed, the putative mischief giving rise to it. It is a failure because it admits only limited and optional prosecutorial input into forum bar decisions and, more fundamentally, because it is founded upon two misplaced premises. The forum bar is irredeemable and should be repealed.

KW - Extradition

KW - forum

KW - forum bar

KW - concurrent jurisdiction

KW - forum non conveniens

U2 - 10.1177/0022018320902544

DO - 10.1177/0022018320902544

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-0183

VL - 84

SP - 142

EP - 162

JO - The Journal of Criminal Law

JF - The Journal of Criminal Law

IS - 2

ER -

The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law: an Unnecessary Failure

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this