TY - JOUR
T1 - The framed and contested meanings of sport mega-event “legacies”
T2 - A case study of the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games
AU - McKenzie, Jamal A.
AU - Ludvigsen, Jan A. Lee
AU - Scott-Bell, Andrea
AU - Hayton, John W.
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - This article examines the ways in which envisioned sport mega-event legacies are publicly framed, communicated and contested. By employing Bourdieusian field theory, the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (CWG) as a case, and drawing upon documentary and media analysis, this article questions how CWG 2022 legacies were framed in a pre-event context. The article makes two key arguments. First, dominant actors within the mega-event field framed a considerable part of their pre-event legacies in terms of intangible inclusivity legacies relating to the host city's local communities, workforce and volunteering practices. Second, alongside these framed legacies, counterclaims emerged from actors on a civil society level, illustrative of a wider scepticism toward mega-events’ effects in the present day. Whilst limited scholarship has examined CWG 2022 to date, this paper also advances scholarship on sport mega-events’ socio-political legacies whilst it, theoretically, unpacks Bourdieu's tools of ‘field’ and ‘doxa’ in a new context.
AB - This article examines the ways in which envisioned sport mega-event legacies are publicly framed, communicated and contested. By employing Bourdieusian field theory, the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (CWG) as a case, and drawing upon documentary and media analysis, this article questions how CWG 2022 legacies were framed in a pre-event context. The article makes two key arguments. First, dominant actors within the mega-event field framed a considerable part of their pre-event legacies in terms of intangible inclusivity legacies relating to the host city's local communities, workforce and volunteering practices. Second, alongside these framed legacies, counterclaims emerged from actors on a civil society level, illustrative of a wider scepticism toward mega-events’ effects in the present day. Whilst limited scholarship has examined CWG 2022 to date, this paper also advances scholarship on sport mega-events’ socio-political legacies whilst it, theoretically, unpacks Bourdieu's tools of ‘field’ and ‘doxa’ in a new context.
KW - Bourdieu
KW - Legacy
KW - contestations
KW - field
KW - sport mega-event
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191043566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10126902241246145
DO - 10.1177/10126902241246145
M3 - Article
SN - 1012-6902
VL - 59
SP - 921
EP - 940
JO - International Review for the Sociology of Sport
JF - International Review for the Sociology of Sport
IS - 6
ER -