The Governance Regime of the Mekong River Basin - 
Can the Global Water Conventions Strengthen the 1995 Mekong Agreement?

Alistair Rieu-Clarke; Remy Kinna

doi:10.1163/23529369-12340005

The Governance Regime of the Mekong River Basin - Can the Global Water Conventions Strengthen the 1995 Mekong Agreement?

Alistair Rieu-Clarke, Remy Kinna

Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Entry into force of the UN Watercourses Convention in August 2014, and the opening of the UNECE Water Convention to all states in March 2016, are significant milestones in international water law. A comparative analysis of these two global water conven- tions and the 1995 Mekong Agreement shows that all three instruments are generally compatible. Nonetheless, the international legal principles and processes set forth in the two conventions can render the Mekong Agreement more up to date, robust and practical. Strengthening the Agreement would be timely, given the increasing pres- sures associated with the rapid hydropower development within the basin and the gradually emerging disputes therein. Because of these fast-moving developments, the monograph strongly recommends that the Mekong states seriously consider joining both conventions in order to buttress and clarify key provisions of the 1995 Mekong Agreement.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-84
Journal	Brill Research Perspectives in International Water Law
Volume	2
Issue number	1
Early online date	12 May 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/23529369-12340005
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 12 May 2017

Access to Document

10.1163/23529369-12340005Licence: CC BY

Governance regime Mekong River BasinFinal published version, 1.03 MBLicence: CC BY

http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/30744/Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{4261260c49db43398fe32b45a1363051,

title = "The Governance Regime of the Mekong River Basin - Can the Global Water Conventions Strengthen the 1995 Mekong Agreement?",

abstract = "Entry into force of the UN Watercourses Convention in August 2014, and the opening of the UNECE Water Convention to all states in March 2016, are significant milestones in international water law. A comparative analysis of these two global water conven- tions and the 1995 Mekong Agreement shows that all three instruments are generally compatible. Nonetheless, the international legal principles and processes set forth in the two conventions can render the Mekong Agreement more up to date, robust and practical. Strengthening the Agreement would be timely, given the increasing pres- sures associated with the rapid hydropower development within the basin and the gradually emerging disputes therein. Because of these fast-moving developments, the monograph strongly recommends that the Mekong states seriously consider joining both conventions in order to buttress and clarify key provisions of the 1995 Mekong Agreement.",

keywords = "Watercourses Convention, cooperation, dispute settlement, sustainable development, Mekong Agreement",

author = "Alistair Rieu-Clarke and Remy Kinna",

year = "2017",

month = may,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1163/23529369-12340005",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "1--84",

journal = "Brill Research Perspectives in International Water Law",

issn = "2352-9350",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Governance Regime of the Mekong River Basin - Can the Global Water Conventions Strengthen the 1995 Mekong Agreement?

AU - Rieu-Clarke, Alistair

AU - Kinna, Remy

PY - 2017/5/12

Y1 - 2017/5/12

N2 - Entry into force of the UN Watercourses Convention in August 2014, and the opening of the UNECE Water Convention to all states in March 2016, are significant milestones in international water law. A comparative analysis of these two global water conven- tions and the 1995 Mekong Agreement shows that all three instruments are generally compatible. Nonetheless, the international legal principles and processes set forth in the two conventions can render the Mekong Agreement more up to date, robust and practical. Strengthening the Agreement would be timely, given the increasing pres- sures associated with the rapid hydropower development within the basin and the gradually emerging disputes therein. Because of these fast-moving developments, the monograph strongly recommends that the Mekong states seriously consider joining both conventions in order to buttress and clarify key provisions of the 1995 Mekong Agreement.

AB - Entry into force of the UN Watercourses Convention in August 2014, and the opening of the UNECE Water Convention to all states in March 2016, are significant milestones in international water law. A comparative analysis of these two global water conven- tions and the 1995 Mekong Agreement shows that all three instruments are generally compatible. Nonetheless, the international legal principles and processes set forth in the two conventions can render the Mekong Agreement more up to date, robust and practical. Strengthening the Agreement would be timely, given the increasing pres- sures associated with the rapid hydropower development within the basin and the gradually emerging disputes therein. Because of these fast-moving developments, the monograph strongly recommends that the Mekong states seriously consider joining both conventions in order to buttress and clarify key provisions of the 1995 Mekong Agreement.

KW - Watercourses Convention

KW - cooperation

KW - dispute settlement

KW - sustainable development

KW - Mekong Agreement

U2 - 10.1163/23529369-12340005

DO - 10.1163/23529369-12340005

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 84

JO - Brill Research Perspectives in International Water Law

JF - Brill Research Perspectives in International Water Law

SN - 2352-9350

IS - 1

ER -

The Governance Regime of the Mekong River Basin - Can the Global Water Conventions Strengthen the 1995 Mekong Agreement?

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this