Abstract
In 2020, almost all research labs in industry, academia, and the government were shut down for long periods of time by political leaders to control the spread of the coronavirus. We consider the “micro” and “macro” implications of ongoing coronavirus disruptions in scientific research and the dissemination and commercialization of that research. We have identified three key unanswered research questions regarding these unprecedented disruptions: (1) How is the pandemic affecting conventional measures of scientific output (the quantity and quality of basic research) and performance, social networks, and the strategic management of innovation? (2) How is the pandemic affecting technology transfer offices, incubators, accelerators, science and technology parks, and other aspects of the innovation ecosystem? (3) How do pandemic disruptions affect micro‐level factors, such as role conflict, identity, work‐life balance, equity, diversity, inclusion, “championing,” leadership, and organizational justice?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1389-1394 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Management Studies |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 17 Mar 2021 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic
- championing/leadership
- commercialization of science
- public-private partnerships
- scientific workplace
- social networks
- work-life balance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Quarantines, Lockdowns, and ‘Reopenings’ on the Commercialization of Science: Micro and Macro Issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver