Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Importance of Appropriate Allocation to Offending Behavior Programs

Emma Palmer, James McGuire, Ruth Hatcher, Juliet C. Hounsome, Charlotte Bilby, Clive Hollin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examined the impact on reconviction of appropriate allocation to three general offending behavior programs involving adult male offenders in the English and Welsh Probation Service. Appropriate allocation was defined by level of risk for reconviction. There were three allocation groups: too low, appropriate, and too high. Using a quasi-experimental design, the reconviction rates of offenders who were allocated to and completed a program, offenders allocated to a program who failed to start, and a comparison group were compared. It was found that the appropriateness of allocation affected reconviction independently of treatment group. Furthermore, in line with the risk principle, there was an interaction between treatment group and the appropriateness of allocation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)206-221
    JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
    Volume52
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • programs
    • appropriate allocation
    • reconviction
    • community

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Importance of Appropriate Allocation to Offending Behavior Programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this