TY - JOUR
T1 - The inclusion of biodiversity into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework
T2 - A strategic integration of ecocentric extinction accounting
AU - Kopnina, Helen
AU - Zhang, Scarlett Ruopiao
AU - Anthony, Sam
AU - Hassan, Abeer
AU - Maroun, Warren
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Traditional Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics have primarily focused on promoting sustainable finance, positive screening, and sustainability reporting. However, recent research highlights the urgency for greater accountability and action to counter species extinction. This article explores the potential of ESG frameworks in guiding corporate and managerial decision-making to address biodiversity loss. As the current ESG indicators exhibit an anthropocentric bias, limiting their effectiveness for protecting biodiversity, this article aims to strategically integrate pragmatic extinction accounting with an ecocentric (deep ecology) perspective. This perspective addresses the root causes of biodiversity loss and offers support to species that are perceived as economically, socially, or culturally unimportant. We present our findings as a call to all stakeholders—business and policy decision-makers, conservationists, and environmental organizations—to formulate robust, inclusive, and ecologically sensitive strategies incorporating deep ecological perspectives. The findings of this study include recommendations for the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This study provides an important contribution to stakeholder theory that supports non-human stakeholders. Besides, this paper showcases how the improved ESG framework could empower companies to confront extinction risks in a more proactive and accelerated manner.
AB - Traditional Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics have primarily focused on promoting sustainable finance, positive screening, and sustainability reporting. However, recent research highlights the urgency for greater accountability and action to counter species extinction. This article explores the potential of ESG frameworks in guiding corporate and managerial decision-making to address biodiversity loss. As the current ESG indicators exhibit an anthropocentric bias, limiting their effectiveness for protecting biodiversity, this article aims to strategically integrate pragmatic extinction accounting with an ecocentric (deep ecology) perspective. This perspective addresses the root causes of biodiversity loss and offers support to species that are perceived as economically, socially, or culturally unimportant. We present our findings as a call to all stakeholders—business and policy decision-makers, conservationists, and environmental organizations—to formulate robust, inclusive, and ecologically sensitive strategies incorporating deep ecological perspectives. The findings of this study include recommendations for the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This study provides an important contribution to stakeholder theory that supports non-human stakeholders. Besides, this paper showcases how the improved ESG framework could empower companies to confront extinction risks in a more proactive and accelerated manner.
KW - Biodiversity loss
KW - Ecocentrism
KW - Environmental, social and governance (ESG factors
KW - Extinction accounting
KW - Intermediate ecology
KW - Pragmatic extinction accounting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180361890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119808
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119808
M3 - Article
C2 - 38103427
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 351
SP - 119808
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 119808
ER -