The influence of pupil alignment on spectator address in Manet's portraiture

Nick Donnelly*, Beth Harland, Natalie Mestry, Natalie Thompson, Tobiasz Trawiński, Simon P. Liversedge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Participants judged 94 portraits painted by édouard Manet (70), Gustave Courbet (12) and Henri Fantin-Latour (12) for horizontal and vertical pupil misalignment and gaze ambiguity (Experiment 1) and focal point of gaze (Experiment 2). Eye movements were also measured as participants considered the extent to which sitters in the same portraits acknowledged viewers (spectators; Experiment 3). The results showed Manet portraits to be frequently painted with misaligned pupils that are associated with gaze ambiguity, especially when misaligned on the vertical axis. This ambiguity of gaze was associated with the average focal point of gaze as being judged further up and to the left of the center for ambiguous relative to nonambiguous portraits. These decisions in relation to portraits displaying ambiguous gaze were associated with increased eye-movements to the eye region relative to those portraits not displaying ambiguity. Finally, ratings of acknowledgment taken in Experiment 3 correlated with those of gaze ambiguity taken in Experiment 1. The results are interpreted in terms of the role of eye gaze in influencing spectatorship of portraits and, specifically, Fried's theory of the "double relation" (Fried, 1980, 1996) between painting and spectator in the paintings of Manet.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-178
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Facingness
  • Gaze
  • Gaze ambiguity
  • Manet
  • Portraiture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of pupil alignment on spectator address in Manet's portraiture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this