Abstract
This chapter explores the approach to AML, mapping its evolution from the US and the war on drugs in the early 1980s through to the establishment of the FATF and global regulatory framework that we have in place today. We unpick the figures behind the threat narrative and the size of the money laundering problem, highlighting the lack of clarity over what is or is not being counted. Drawing data from the mutual evaluation process and its associated costs, we expose that the severity of the existing anti-money laundering policy fails the basic test of proportionality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Illegal Entrepreneurship, Organized Crime and Social Control: Essays in Honour of Professor Dick Hobbs |
| Editors | Georgios Antonopoulos |
| Place of Publication | London |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 161-186 |
| Number of pages | 360 |
| Volume | 14 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783319316062 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 May 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Studies of Organized Crime Series Volume |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- money laundering
- mutual evaluation
- financial action task force
- proportionality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Monty Python Flying Circus of money laundering and the question of proportionality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver