The power and potential of Behavioural Design: practice, methodology, and ethics

Camilla K.E. Bay Brix Nielsen*, Philip Cash, Jaap Daalhuizen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    36 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Behavioural designers adopt practices from both design and behavioural science. Yet methodological discussions are fragmented across these fields. In response, this paper – for the first time – examines and draws together research on decision-making and methodologies applied to behavioural design via a systematic review. We identify three major themes challenging current understanding of behavioural design: Complex behavioural design space, Systemic behavioural design, and Behavioural design empathy and ethics. These themes give rise to a fundamental reconceptualization of the behavioural design process captured in our ‘Behavioural Design IM-PACT process model’. This model integrates a fuzzy front and back end around a co-evolutionary development process. Through this, we explain how design and behavioural science practices can be synthesised to deal with wicked behavioural problems in a complex context where a long intervention afterlife is inevitable. This highlights the way towards more integrative behavioural design with major implications for researchers and practitioners across fields.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)504-542
    Number of pages39
    JournalJournal of Engineering Design
    Volume35
    Issue number5
    Early online date13 Mar 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2024

    Keywords

    • Behavioural design
    • design methodology
    • design practice
    • decision making
    • systematic review

    Cite this