The Prüm Regime: Situated Dis/Empowerment in Transnational DNA Profile Exchange

Barbara Prainsack, Victor Toom

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    60 Citations (Scopus)
    65 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper takes critique of surveillance studies scholars of the shortcomings of the panoptic model for analysing contemporary systems of surveillance as a starting point. We argue that core conceptual tools, in conjunction with an under-conceptualization of agency, privilege a focus on the oppressive elements of surveillance. This often yields unsatisfying insights to why surveillance works, for whom, and at whose costs. We discuss the so-called Prüm regime, pertaining to transnational data exchange for forensic and police use in the EU, to illustrate how—by articulating instances of what we call ‘situated dis/empowerment’—agency can be better conceptualized, sharpening our gaze for the large extent to which the empowering and disempowering effects of surveillance depend on each other.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1117-1135
    JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
    Volume50
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

    Keywords

    • surveillance
    • forensic DNA technologies
    • Prüm Decision
    • situated dis/empowerment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Prüm Regime: Situated Dis/Empowerment in Transnational DNA Profile Exchange'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this