Abstract
In recent years, scientists have noted a decline in the health of bee populations. Whereas a whole host of possible causes have been identified, it is the use of pesticides in agriculture—specifically the use of neonicotinoids—that has warranted some investigation. The scientific evidence of their impact on the health of bees remains debated. This article examines how the UK Government has responded to the decline in bee populations and the apparent link to neonicotinoids. While notionally committed to deploying the Precautionary Principle in such instances, the government has tended to err more on ‘sound science’ as a policymaking tool. Early evidence indicates that the government used the latter initially but has become more amenable to utilising a precautionary approach recently. Whether this can be attributed to an embrace of the Precautionary Principle, or simply a change caused by the installation of a new Secretary of State for the Environment, is open to interpretation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 441-449 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Science and Public Policy |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 26 Dec 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Bee health
- Government regulation
- Precautionary principle
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The precautionary principle at work: The case of neonicotinoids and the health of bees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver