TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of the expert knowledge broker in rural development: Renewable energy funding decisions in Greece
AU - Apostolopoulos, Nikolaos
AU - Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J.
AU - Liargovas, Panagiotis G.
AU - Newbery, Robert
AU - Rokou, Elena
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Within debates on rural development, Neo-Endogenous Development has emerged as the consensus ‘best-practice’ approach. Central to this approach is the role of the Expert Knowledge Broker – the conduit that brings local and ‘extra-local’ together. This paper contests that, despite a wealth of research on this paradigm and the knowledge flows that operate within, little research has been conducted regarding the decision-making process of the Expert Knowledge Broker. However, this is arguably decisive in which type of rural development is enacted. Using the allocation of funding for Renewable Energy projects in Greece as a critical context, this paper explores the decision-making approach of experts using Analytic Hierarchical Process analysis. We find that the type of rural development enacted is contingent upon the funding decision and the balance between local and extra-local funding decisions vary depending upon heterogeneous criteria. The paper contributes to knowledge through a nuanced explanation of the role of the Expert Knowledge Broker and suggests how EU Renewable Energy policy funding decisions can become more effective.
AB - Within debates on rural development, Neo-Endogenous Development has emerged as the consensus ‘best-practice’ approach. Central to this approach is the role of the Expert Knowledge Broker – the conduit that brings local and ‘extra-local’ together. This paper contests that, despite a wealth of research on this paradigm and the knowledge flows that operate within, little research has been conducted regarding the decision-making process of the Expert Knowledge Broker. However, this is arguably decisive in which type of rural development is enacted. Using the allocation of funding for Renewable Energy projects in Greece as a critical context, this paper explores the decision-making approach of experts using Analytic Hierarchical Process analysis. We find that the type of rural development enacted is contingent upon the funding decision and the balance between local and extra-local funding decisions vary depending upon heterogeneous criteria. The paper contributes to knowledge through a nuanced explanation of the role of the Expert Knowledge Broker and suggests how EU Renewable Energy policy funding decisions can become more effective.
KW - AHP
KW - EU Structural funds
KW - Renewable energy
KW - Rural communities
KW - Rural development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086586992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086586992
SN - 0743-0167
VL - 78
SP - 96
EP - 106
JO - Journal of Rural Studies
JF - Journal of Rural Studies
ER -