Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Significance of Unifying Non-Integrated Information on Contaminated Land and Risks

Jacob Brotherton, Shoaib Hussain, Michael Deary, Charf Mahammedi, Cara D. Beal, Talib E. Butt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Like several countries with industrial history and heritage, the risks associated with contaminated land (CL) are a widespread challenge in the United Kingdom (UK). Contaminated land and their risks are managed by local authorities, although consultancy is often sought from non-governmental organisations. There is a legal requirement for the relevant local authority to hold data on the status of any contaminated land and associated risks within their geographical remit. However, minimal legislation exists regarding the standardisation of documentation, including records of contaminated site management and the associated administrative procedures. Another fundamental challenge is that the data concerning contaminated land is non-integrated. This is because hundreds of different local authorities up and down the country manage sites in a non-uniform manner. The same is the case in England and Wales, which is the geographical remit of this study. For instance, there are variations in format, type of data, presentation of data, procedures to access the data (e.g., by environmental consultants), quality of data, and even quantity of data. To overcome such issues presented by the lack of integration, there is a substantial need for unification and standardisation at all scales. This study not only presents an account of aforesaid issues and their adverse implications but also outlines innovative models that can enhance the integration, unification, simplification, and standardisation of data/information management from local authorities through to a national level. These conceptual models involve the application of information matrices and GIS. Such models, when fully developed in future, can enhance the environmental communication and coordination between the diverse stakeholders involved in each contaminated site scenario, particularly including environmental regulators e.g., the Environment Agency or Natural Resources Wales, environmental consultants, and local authorities; similarly other associated stakeholders such as developers, the construction industry and land reclamation specialists.

Original languageEnglish
Article number51
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume76
Issue number2
Early online date27 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • England
  • Environmental Monitoring/methods
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Risk Assessment
  • United Kingdom
  • Wales
  • Contaminated Land
  • Environmental communication
  • Special Sites
  • Information Management
  • GIS Model
  • Contaminated Sites

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Significance of Unifying Non-Integrated Information on Contaminated Land and Risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this