The Specific Evidence Rule: Reference Classes – Individuals – Personal Autonomy

Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper grapples with the issue of naked statistical evidence in general and the reference class problem (RCP) in particular. By analysing the reasoning patterns underlying the RCP, I will show, first, that the RCP rests on theoretical presuppositions which we are by no means bound to accept. Such a presupposition is is, what I will call, the wholesale approach in decision-making. Sec-ondly, I will show that the very effort to increase the level of precision to a maximum so that a refer-ence class contains a single member only is theoretically inconsistent insofar, as it deprives reference classes of their general (and thus scientific) character. Thereupon, I will argue, thirdly, that the de-cision to enact a specific evidence rule is a political one and reflects deep moral and jurisprudential values, not scientific propositions. Such a value is personal autonomy, which I go on to illuminate briefly. Whether the trier of fact will treat cases in a wholesale approach or not depends on consti-tutional arrangements and legal values putting emphasis on the individual and the latter’s dignity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalQuaestio facti
Volume4
Issue number1
Early online date8 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Specific Evidence Rule: Reference Classes – Individuals – Personal Autonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this