Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders.

Tobiasz Trawiński*, Natalie Mestry, Beth Harland, Simon P. Liversedge, Hayward J. Godwin, Nick Donnelly

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The spectatorship of portraits by naïve viewers (beholders) was explored in a single experiment. Twenty-five participants rated their liking for 142 portraits painted by Courbet (36 paintings), Fantin-Latour (36 paintings), and Manet (70 paintings) on a 4-point Likert scale. The portraits were classified in terms of focused versus ambiguous nature of sitter gaze and the presence of salient features in the context beyond sitters. Participants rated portraits while having their eye movements recorded. The portraits were split into regions of interest (ROIs) defined by faces, bodies, and context. Participants also completed individual difference measures of attention and task focus. Results showed naïve spectatorship to be subject to attentional capture by faces. Paradoxically, the presence of salient features in the context amplified the attentional capture by faces through increasing participants liking of portraits. Attentional capture by faces was also influenced by sitter gaze and task focus. Unsurprisingly, the spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders is dominated by faces, but the extent of this dominance is influenced by exogenous and endogenous attentional factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-19
Number of pages17
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • gaze
  • portraiture
  • salient features
  • spectatorship of paintings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this