TY - JOUR
T1 - Under-Served in Qualitative Health Research: Overcoming Challenges to Recruiting People Who Frequently Use Urgent and Emergency Care Services
AU - Mason, Celia
AU - Moseley, Lisa
AU - Ariss, Steven
AU - Collins, Tracy
AU - Khanom, Ashrafunnesa
AU - Pilkington, Gerlinde
AU - Porter, Alison
AU - Saraiva, Sonia
AU - Watkins, Alan
AU - Scott, Jason
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - There is little understanding of challenges encountered when recruiting people who frequently use urgent and emergency care (UEC) services to qualitative research. This is despite considerable evidence that people who frequently use healthcare services are a heterogenous group, who are under-served in qualitative research with voices that are seldom heard. This is particularly problematic when their use of healthcare services is often associated with unmet complex health or social care issues, chronic health conditions, and factors such as lower socioeconomic status; also associated with lack of involvement in health research and challenges to health status. This paper provides insight into recruiting this under-served and seldom-heard population to qualitative research studies and suggests how identified challenges could be overcome in future research. Using Rolfe et al.’s Reflective Framework (2001), we examine processes and outcomes of five studies with differing methodological recruitment approaches to identify common challenges and facilitators of recruitment success. All studies aimed to recruit people who frequently used one or more UEC service. In comparing approaches, we identified two key stages of the research process that most contributed to difficulties and successes in recruitment of service users, and thus are deemed to be critical junctures: (1) Research Planning and Design, and (2) Research Delivery. The first contained themes around systems factors and study design factors, whilst the second included relational factors and personal factors. Recruitment was challenging across all studies due to unpredictable interplay of these four factors, indicating that there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach for future research. This reflects the heterogeneous nature of the group, and suggests that multiple, targeted approaches to recruitment need to be co-designed with multiple service users from the outset. We make further recommendations that may also be transferred to other under-served and seldom-heard populations.
AB - There is little understanding of challenges encountered when recruiting people who frequently use urgent and emergency care (UEC) services to qualitative research. This is despite considerable evidence that people who frequently use healthcare services are a heterogenous group, who are under-served in qualitative research with voices that are seldom heard. This is particularly problematic when their use of healthcare services is often associated with unmet complex health or social care issues, chronic health conditions, and factors such as lower socioeconomic status; also associated with lack of involvement in health research and challenges to health status. This paper provides insight into recruiting this under-served and seldom-heard population to qualitative research studies and suggests how identified challenges could be overcome in future research. Using Rolfe et al.’s Reflective Framework (2001), we examine processes and outcomes of five studies with differing methodological recruitment approaches to identify common challenges and facilitators of recruitment success. All studies aimed to recruit people who frequently used one or more UEC service. In comparing approaches, we identified two key stages of the research process that most contributed to difficulties and successes in recruitment of service users, and thus are deemed to be critical junctures: (1) Research Planning and Design, and (2) Research Delivery. The first contained themes around systems factors and study design factors, whilst the second included relational factors and personal factors. Recruitment was challenging across all studies due to unpredictable interplay of these four factors, indicating that there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach for future research. This reflects the heterogeneous nature of the group, and suggests that multiple, targeted approaches to recruitment need to be co-designed with multiple service users from the outset. We make further recommendations that may also be transferred to other under-served and seldom-heard populations.
KW - high intensity users
KW - qualitative
KW - recruitment
KW - research
KW - under-served in research
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019766569
U2 - 10.1177/16094069251383463
DO - 10.1177/16094069251383463
M3 - Article
SN - 1609-4069
VL - 24
JO - The International Journal of Qualitative Methods
JF - The International Journal of Qualitative Methods
M1 - 16094069251383463
ER -