Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding accountability and governance in post-invasion Iraq

Keith Baker, Ellen Rubin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Using the accountability framework developed by Romzek, Dubnick, and colleagues, this article considers the creation and operation of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). The CPA’s short duration and the difficult circumstances of Iraq combined to pose fundamental challenges to the normal expectations for accountable behavior of a federal agency. With minimal plans in place for governing Post-invasion Iraq, the CPA had little structure and few institutional expectations to influence its behavior. This lack of guidance, combined with the CPA’s de facto reporting relationships and noncareer staff, led to the maximization of political accountability, whereas professional accountability was secondary.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)515-536
    JournalAdministration & Society
    Volume43
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • accountability
    • institutional competition
    • Iraq War Coalition
    • Provisional Authority

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding accountability and governance in post-invasion Iraq'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this