TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care
T2 - The normalization process model
AU - May, Carl
AU - Finch, Tracy
AU - Mair, Frances
AU - Ballini, Luciana
AU - Dowrick, Christopher
AU - Eccles, Martin
AU - Gask, Linda
AU - MacFarlane, Anne
AU - Murray, Elizabeth
AU - Rapley, Tim
AU - Rogers, Anne
AU - Treweek, Shaun
AU - Wallace, Paul
AU - Anderson, George
AU - Burns, Jo
AU - Heaven, Ben
PY - 2007/9/19
Y1 - 2007/9/19
N2 - Background. The Normalization Process Model is a theoretical model that assists in explaining the processes by which complex interventions become routinely embedded in health care practice. It offers a framework for process evaluation and also for comparative studies of complex interventions. It focuses on the factors that promote or inhibit the routine embedding of complex interventions in health care practice. Methods. A formal theory structure is used to define the model, and its internal causal relations and mechanisms. The model is broken down to show that it is consistent and adequate in generating accurate description, systematic explanation, and the production of rational knowledge claims about the workability and integration of complex interventions. Results. The model explains the normalization of complex interventions by reference to four factors demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration). Conclusion. The model is consistent and adequate. Repeated calls for theoretically sound process evaluations in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions, and policy-makers who call for a proper understanding of implementation processes, emphasize the value of conceptual tools like the Normalization Process Model.
AB - Background. The Normalization Process Model is a theoretical model that assists in explaining the processes by which complex interventions become routinely embedded in health care practice. It offers a framework for process evaluation and also for comparative studies of complex interventions. It focuses on the factors that promote or inhibit the routine embedding of complex interventions in health care practice. Methods. A formal theory structure is used to define the model, and its internal causal relations and mechanisms. The model is broken down to show that it is consistent and adequate in generating accurate description, systematic explanation, and the production of rational knowledge claims about the workability and integration of complex interventions. Results. The model explains the normalization of complex interventions by reference to four factors demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration). Conclusion. The model is consistent and adequate. Repeated calls for theoretically sound process evaluations in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions, and policy-makers who call for a proper understanding of implementation processes, emphasize the value of conceptual tools like the Normalization Process Model.
U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148
DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148
M3 - Article
C2 - 17880693
AN - SCOPUS:36348983274
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 7
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
M1 - 148
ER -