Unfitness to plead and restraining orders: 'a lacuna in the court's armoury'

Natalie Wortley

doi:10.1177/0022018315579586b

Unfitness to plead and restraining orders: 'a lacuna in the court's armoury'

Natalie Wortley

Law Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses the decision in R v Chinegwundoh [2014] EWCA Crim 2649. Explains some of the difficulties that courts may face in imposing supervision orders on those who have been found unfit to plead, and suggests that restraining orders should also be available on disposal.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	87-89
Journal	The Journal of Criminal Law
Volume	79
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018315579586b
Publication status	Published - Apr 2015

Access to Document

10.1177/0022018315579586b

R v Chinegwundoh finalAccepted author manuscript, 21.9 KB
R v Chinegwundoh final (1)Accepted author manuscript, 135 KB

Cite this

@article{e7a8e53952ee4ee88d83e65051bd1658,

title = "Unfitness to plead and restraining orders: 'a lacuna in the court's armoury'",

abstract = "Discusses the decision in R v Chinegwundoh [2014] EWCA Crim 2649. Explains some of the difficulties that courts may face in imposing supervision orders on those who have been found unfit to plead, and suggests that restraining orders should also be available on disposal.",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2015",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1177/0022018315579586b",

language = "English",

volume = "79",

pages = "87--89",

journal = "The Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "1740-5580",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unfitness to plead and restraining orders: 'a lacuna in the court's armoury'

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - Discusses the decision in R v Chinegwundoh [2014] EWCA Crim 2649. Explains some of the difficulties that courts may face in imposing supervision orders on those who have been found unfit to plead, and suggests that restraining orders should also be available on disposal.

AB - Discusses the decision in R v Chinegwundoh [2014] EWCA Crim 2649. Explains some of the difficulties that courts may face in imposing supervision orders on those who have been found unfit to plead, and suggests that restraining orders should also be available on disposal.

U2 - 10.1177/0022018315579586b

DO - 10.1177/0022018315579586b

M3 - Article

SN - 1740-5580

VL - 79

SP - 87

EP - 89

JO - The Journal of Criminal Law

JF - The Journal of Criminal Law

IS - 2

ER -

Unfitness to plead and restraining orders: 'a lacuna in the court's armoury'

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this