Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2

Kevin Kerrigan; Natalie Wortley

doi:10.1177/0022018315589030b

Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2

Kevin Kerrigan, Natalie Wortley

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The four conjoined appeals dealt with in this judgment raise similar issues concerning the operation of the ‘trial of the facts’ procedure, which follows a finding that the accused is unfit to plead.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	160-164
Journal	The Journal of Criminal Law
Volume	79
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018315589030b
Publication status	Published - Jun 2015

Keywords

Unfitness to plead
s. 4A hearings
actus reus
mens rea
objective evidence
self-defence

Access to Document

10.1177/0022018315589030b

Cite this

@article{65b7551262734af68a03cca4c56e512b,

title = "Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2",

abstract = "The four conjoined appeals dealt with in this judgment raise similar issues concerning the operation of the {\textquoteleft}trial of the facts{\textquoteright} procedure, which follows a finding that the accused is unfit to plead.",

keywords = "Unfitness to plead, s. 4A hearings, actus reus, mens rea, objective evidence, self-defence",

author = "Kevin Kerrigan and Natalie Wortley",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1177/0022018315589030b",

language = "English",

volume = "79",

pages = "160--164",

journal = "The Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "1740-5580",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2

AU - Kerrigan, Kevin

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - The four conjoined appeals dealt with in this judgment raise similar issues concerning the operation of the ‘trial of the facts’ procedure, which follows a finding that the accused is unfit to plead.

AB - The four conjoined appeals dealt with in this judgment raise similar issues concerning the operation of the ‘trial of the facts’ procedure, which follows a finding that the accused is unfit to plead.

KW - Unfitness to plead

KW - s. 4A hearings

KW - actus reus

KW - mens rea

KW - objective evidence

KW - self-defence

U2 - 10.1177/0022018315589030b

DO - 10.1177/0022018315589030b

M3 - Article

SN - 1740-5580

VL - 79

SP - 160

EP - 164

JO - The Journal of Criminal Law

JF - The Journal of Criminal Law

IS - 3

ER -

Unfitness to Plead: Expanding the Scope of 'Objective Evidence' on the 'Trial of the Facts': R v Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail [2015] EWCA Crim 2

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this